NOVEMBER 8, 2016 GENERAL ELECTION
For More Information Visit: www.azjudges.info
Reading This Data
Judicial Performance Commission results indicate how JPR Commissioners voted, whether a judge “MEETS” Judicial Performance Standards based on survey information as well as all other information submitted by the public or the judge. Judicial Performance Surveys percentages show results of surveys completed by respondents based on the averaged results of the survey respondents who rated the judge “satisfactory” or better in combined Judicial Performance Standards categories.
|
TIMMER, ANN A. SCOTT Appointed to Supreme Court: 2012 |
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
||
|
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
|
|
Legal Ability Integrity Communication Skills Judicial Temperament Administrative Performance |
88% 97% 97% 96% 94% |
92% 100% N/A N/A 67% |
|
|
BROWN, MICHAEL J. Appointed to Court of Appeals |
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
||
|
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
|
|
Legal Ability Integrity Communication Skills Judicial Temperament Administrative Performance |
87% 99% 100% 100% 86% |
97% 94% N/A N/A 98% |
|
|
CATTANI, KENT E. Appointed to Court of Appeals |
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
||
|
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
|
|
Legal Ability Integrity Communication Skills Judicial Temperament Administrative Performance |
85% 93% 100% 100% 93% |
99% 100% N/A N/A 97% |
|
|
JONES, KENTON D. Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2013 |
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
||
|
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
|
|
Legal Ability Integrity Communication Skills Judicial Temperament Administrative Performance |
86% 95% 97% 97% 93% |
100% 100% N/A N/A 96% |
|
|
THOMPSON, JON W. Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 1995 |
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
||
|
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
|
|
Legal Ability Integrity Communication Skills Judicial Temperament Administrative Performance |
80% 97% 95% 98% 92% |
92% 100% N/A N/A 100% |
|
|
WINTHROP, LAWRENCE F. Appointed to Court of Appeals Division I: 2002 |
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
||
|
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
|
|
Legal Ability Integrity Communication Skills Judicial Temperament Administrative Performance |
91% 99% 100% 100% 100% |
100% 100% N/A N/A 100% |
|
|
MILLER, MICHAEL O. Appointed to Court of Appeals |
JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS 32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards 0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards |
||
|
Judicial Performance Surveys |
Attorney Responses |
Superior Court Judge Responses |
|
|
Legal Ability Integrity Communication Skills Judicial Temperament Administrative Performance |
87% 99% 98% 100% 98% |
94% 100% N/A N/A 98% |
|