GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 8, 2016

Judges • Details • Maricopa County Superior Court

For More Information Visit: www.azjudges.info

Reading This Data

Judicial Performance Commission results indicate how JPR Commissioners voted, whether a judge “MEETS” Judicial Performance Standards based on survey information as well as all other information submitted by the public or the judge. Judicial Performance Surveys percentages show results of surveys completed by respondents based on the averaged results of the survey respondents who rated the judge “satisfactory” or better in combined Judicial Performance Standards categories.

ADLEMAN, JAY A.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2013

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

BEENE, JAMES P.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2009

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

N/A

100%

88%

100%

98%

BRNOVICH, SUSAN M.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2009

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

95%

100%

96%

99%

99%

N/A

99%

97%

97%

100%

BUSTAMANTE, LORI H.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2014

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

88%

99%

92%

99%

97%

N/A

99%

100%

100%

100%

COFFEY, RODRICK J.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2013

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

99%

100%

100%

100%

99%

N/A

92%

97%

88%

90%

COHEN, BRUCE R.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

99%

100%

100%

100%

93%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

99%

COHEN, SUZANNE E.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2013

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

99%

98%

99%

99%

N/A

94%

82%

87%

95%

CONTES, CONNIE C.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2002

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

97%

98%

99%

99%

77%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

COURY, CHRISTOPHER A.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2010

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

96%

98%

100%

91%

98%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

DITSWORTH, JOHN R.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2001

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

97%

100%

95%

100%

96%

N/A

98%

95%

98%

94%

FLORES, LISA D.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2006

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

93%

94%

94%

82%

99%

N/A

88%

80%

71%

88%

GARCIA, JEANNE M.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

31 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

1 Commissioner Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

91%

98%

85%

96%

75%

N/A

87%

81%

85%

84%

GASS, DAVID B.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2009

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

99%

100%

99%

99%

100%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

GATES, PAMELA S.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2009

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

98%

99%

99%

97%

98%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

GENTRY, JO LYNN

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

14 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

17 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

1 Commissioner Did Not Vote

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

81%

82%

75%

88%

88%

N/A

0%

0%

0%

0%

GERLACH, DOUGLAS

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2010

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

31 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

1 JPR Commission Member - Did Not Vote on Self

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

93%

95%

90%

93%

98%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

GORDON, MICHAEL D.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

90%

99%

93%

96%

96%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

98%

HANNAH, JR., JOHN R.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

92%

96%

89%

93%

97%

N/A

94%

93%

95%

96%

HARRISON, CARI A.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2001

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

99%

98%

99%

96%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

KEMP, MICHAEL W.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

97%

96%

98%

94%

99%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

KILEY, DANIEL J.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2010

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

95%

98%

97%

92%

98%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

KLEIN, ANDREW G.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2001

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

MAHONEY, MARGARET R.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2002

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

94%

99%

95%

95%

89%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

MCCOY, M. SCOTT

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2009

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

98%

100%

98%

98%

98%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

MCMURDIE, PAUL J.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

99%

90%

92%

100%

N/A

92%

91%

92%

92%

MCNALLY, COLLEEN A.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2001

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

100%

100%

100%

100%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

MEAD, KATHLEEN H.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2013

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

95%

99%

93%

91%

100%

N/A

91%

85%

77%

90%

MIKITISH, JOSEPH P.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2013

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

97%

98%

95%

97%

86%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

MULLINS, KAREN A.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2006

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

95%

100%

96%

99%

99%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

OBERBILLIG, ROBERT H.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 1998

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

97%

100%

92%

95%

96%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

PADILLA, JOSE S.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2006

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

89%

99%

100%

90%

90%

N/A

88%

83%

67%

89%

PALMER, DAVID J.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2009

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

98%

99%

100%

99%

100%

N/A

97%

89%

94%

95%

RYAN, TIMOTHY J.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2005

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

98%

100%

99%

100%

99%

N/A

100%

95%

100%

100%

SANDERS, TERESA A.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2001

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

100%

99%

100%

99%

N/A

94%

100%

91%

100%

STARR, PATRICIA

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2014

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

93%

98%

94%

96%

97%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

STEPHENS, SHERRY K.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2001

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

97%

99%

100%

100%

99%

N/A

0%

0%

0%

0%

THOMASON, TIMOTHY J.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2014

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

96%

99%

96%

100%

99%

N/A

86%

68%

78%

82%

THOMPSON, PETER A.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2010

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

100%

99%

97%

97%

99%

N/A

95%

92%

92%

99%

UDALL, DAVID K.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2001

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

90%

99%

93%

95%

98%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%

WHITTEN, CHRISTOPHER T.

Appointed to Maricopa County Superior Court: 2006

JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE COMMISSION RESULTS

32 Commissioners Voted “Meets” Judicial Standards

0 Commissioners Voted “Does Not Meet” Judicial Standards

Judicial Performance Surveys

Attorney

Responses

Litigant/Witness

Responses

Legal Ability

Integrity

Communication Skills

Judicial Temperament

Administrative Performance

92%

99%

94%

97%

95%

N/A

100%

100%

100%

100%